Wednesday, December 14, 2005

at&t shouldn't have it both ways on 'IPVT'

Techdirt:
They claim that they don't need a cable license, because what they're offering is "different" -- a claim that would be a lot more credible if they didn't make their IPTV offerings look so much like cable offerings.


If at&t doesn't want to do the cable franchise thing, then they need to have a product that doesn't look so much like a cable tv franchise. And of course I mean real VoD.

Full Disclosure: Mama told me, I couldn't eat my cake and have it too.

No comments: